Laura (b.1999, she/her) is an architectural researcher and cultural practitioner based in London. Spanning essay, poetry, performance and video, her work explores the technologies weaponised by state, corporate and colonial actors to discipline, survey, securitise and pollute space, bodies, objects and stories. Interested by the disorientating effects of computation, automation and gamification on contemporary visual cultures, Laura utilises her practice as a rehearsal space for technical misuse. In doing so, she joins a growing alliance of activists, artists, coders, hackers, and technologists similarly intent on unleashing technology’s subversive and counterforensic potential. 

Laura holds a BA International Relations degree (First Class) from the University of St Andrews and a MA Research Architecture degree (Distinction) from Goldsmiths' Centre for Research Architecture.

She is the Publishing and Project Coordinator at the design studio OK-RM and its publishing imprint InOtherWords





















Index


01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08


Project

Reverberations
Collapse as method
How to give back a stolen glance
Stone, Virus, Rubble
Echoes
Shuffle, squeak, ssh!, shutter, click
Destruction shall be our inventory 
#europe is not my centre! 
Medium

Group Exhibition
Public Talk
Video
Video
Writing 
Video
Lecture Performance
Video



Laura Russell
laurarussell16@outlook.com

CV
01Reverberations

St James Hatcham Church
London
25 September–2 October, 2025
Group Exhibition

MA Degree Show
Research Architecture
Goldsmiths University


Reverberations is a group exhibition showcasing the work of the MA Research Architecture 2025 cohort. The exhibition gathers projects that act as sensors for different conditions: from slow violence to sudden rupture, ancestral memory to digital surveillance, collapse to refusal. Together, they form a constellation that reverberates across time and space, forging fragile yet urgent connections between struggles and realities. Throughout the week, Reverberations unfolded through workshops, screenings, and radio activations, proposing multiple ways of navigating these worlds. Reverberations insists that things can be otherwise.
1/6 Reverberations, 2025, installation view. Photography by Studio Adamson.  
2/6 How to give back a stolen glance, video (04:30) in Reverberations, 2025, installation view. Photography by Studio Adamson.  
3/6 Technology’s Gaze, diagram on lightbox, in Reverberations, 2025, installation view. Photography by Studio Adamson.  
4/6 Stone, Virus, Rubble, video (03:40) in Reverberations, 2025, installation view. Photography by Studio Adamson.  
5/6 Reverberations, 2025, installation view. Photography by Studio Adamson.  
6/6 #europe is not my centre, video (02:44) in Reverberations, 2025, installation view. Photography by Studio Adamson.  
02Collapse as Method

St James Hatcham Church
London
29 September 2025 
Public Talk

MA Degree Show Public Programme
Research Architecture
Goldsmiths University

As part of the public programme for Reverberations, the graduating MA exhibition from the Centre for Research Architecture, MA candidate and architectural researcher Laura Russell was joined by multidisciplinary artist Parham Ghalamdar for a joint film screening and discussion. Together, Parham and Laura invited their audience to consider how defacement and decay can operate as artistic and activist tactics of dissent against the precarious impossibility of contemporary image-making.

1/4 The Sight is a Wound, 2025, dir. Parham Ghalamdar, cinematography Dean Casper/Caustic Coastal. 
2/4 #europe is not my centre, 2025, Laura Russell.
3/4 The Sight is a Wound, 2025, dir. Parham Ghalamdar, cinematography Dean Casper/Caustic Coastal. 
4/4 How to give back a stolen glance, 2025, Laura Russell .
03How to give back a stolen glance

2025
Video


4 minutes, 30 seconds

How to give back a stolen glance probes the inadequacies of repatriation, framed by the impossibility of its central question: How do we return a glance that has been stolen? Implicit in the act of restitution (the return of a stolen object) is the assumption that the object alone was taken. Such material gestures fail to address the far more violent, complex, and toxic relations binding the Global North and Global South. Performed as strategies of distraction and deferral, restitution risks re-fetishising the very objects it claims to liberate.

The video depicts gloved hands rearranging cut-out images of looted artefacts hoarded within the British Museum’s collection (including the Benin Bronzes, Parthenon Marbles, and Maqdala Cross) against a green-screen backdrop. This staging parodies the processes of abstraction first initiated by the London Missionary Society and sustained through the visual regimes of the museum complex. Interrupting the video’s frame are cuts to a video documentating two agreements signed in Colombo in 2023 between the Netherlands and Sri Lanka, which facilitated the return of six artefacts looted from the Kandyan Kingdom during the Dutch invasion of 1765 and later hoarded in the Rijksmuseum. The video’s frame zooms in on the hand gestures of Gunay Uslu (State Secretary for Culture and Media, Netherlands) and Vidura Wickramanayake (Minister of Buddhasasana, Religious and Cultural Affairs, Sri Lanka): resting on a wooden table, clasped in a handshake, marking their signatures, gesturing at a lectern. These formalised, rehearsed movements echo the sanitised choreography of the video’s gloved figure.

1/6 Still, How to give back a stolen glance, video (04:30), 2025.
2/6 Still, How to give back a stolen glance, video (04:30), 2025.
3/6 Still, How to give back a stolen glance, video (04:30), 2025.
4/6 Still, How to give back a stolen glance, video (04:30), 2025.
5/6 Still, How to give back a stolen glance, video (04:30), 2025.
6/6 Still, How to give back a stolen glance, video (04:30), 2025.
04Stone, Virus, Rubble

2025
Video


3 minutes, 40 seconds

In his article, Diminishment, I: Architecture and the Shelter-Rubble-Dust Continuum published on e-flux in 2025, Achille Mbembe writes: ‘The age of brutalism is akin to the age of rubble and dust. We are surrounded by countless cities of rubble and dust: Grozny, Homs, Aleppo, Gaza... In these hallucinatory times, architecture is about rebuilding lives. It is about the restoration of livelihoods and the provision of shelter for those who, having lost everything and, having been left homeless, “can be at home only in their bodies.”’

Stone, Virus, Rubble presents close-up shots of the British flag hoisted above the British Museum colonnaded façade, paired with a declaration of technical insurgency against the institution. This coupling exposes the museum’s complicity in sustaining the colonial violence of the British state and the ongoing rubblisation of Palestinian bodies in Gaza. The same photogrammetric technologies used as part of the museum’s strategy exhibition display are integrated within the automated targeting systems of Zionist missiles directed towards Palestinian bodies. Stone colonnade, national flag, and rubble are violently and necessarily intertwined.

1/8 Still, Stone Virus Rubble, video (03:40), 2025.  
2/8 Still, Stone Virus Rubble, video (03:40), 2025.  
3/8 Still, Stone Virus Rubble, video (03:40), 2025.  
4/8 Still, Stone Virus Rubble, video (03:40), 2025.  
5/8 Still, Stone Virus Rubble, video (03:40), 2025.  
6/8 Still, Stone Virus Rubble, video (03:40), 2025.  
7/8 Still, Stone Virus Rubble, video (03:40), 2025.  
8/8 Still, Stone Virus Rubble, video (03:40), 2025.  
05Echoes

CRA Press
London
2025
Publication

ISBN: 978-1-0369-3576-4
148 x 210 mm
164 pp

Echoes is a collaborative publication that follows Reverberations, the MA Research Architecture exhibition of 2025. It is an assemblage of poems, images, readings, reflections, experiences, and contradictions. A collective space to express our solidarity; to enjoy our concomitance. To be creative, reflective, and playful; a contemplation of the year spent together, remembering the before and on our way into the after. This publication is the form given to the thoughts and reflections that didn’t fit in our academic texts—quiet fragments which come together, louder.

Laura was the production manager and layout designer for the publication. 

1/1 Echoes, Centre for Research Architecture Masters Programme, London, 2025
06Shuffle, squeak, ssh!, shutter, click

2025
Video


5 minutes, 46 seconds


Shuffle, squeak, ssh!, shutter, click! explores the museum as a site of coercive national power, reflecting on a specific incident which occured at the Musée d'Orsay. In December 2016, Marianne Acqua, a teacher from the Maurice Utrillo de Stains school in Seine-Saint-Dennis led a school visit to the museum in central Paris. The school is in an Education Priority Zone (ZEP), designated for additional support due to concentrated social disadvantages faced by its pupils. The trip was abruptly cut short after one of the museum's wardens told Acqua's pupils to 'shut their mouths'—a reprimand not directed to other, white, middle-class Parisian students also in attendance at the museum that day.

Like the battlefield, museums serve as nationalist rehearsal spaces where conquest is staged and palatized as spectacle. By acknowledging the museum's visual schema as one of detached observation and extractivist commoditication, we realise that photogrammetry's cultural initiation does not absolve its violent past. On the battlefield and in the museum the same tactical intent
persists: to search for traces of the Other.

1/5 Still, Shuffle, squeak, ssh!, shutter, click!, video (05:46), 2025
2/5 Still, Shuffle, squeak, ssh!, shutter, click!, video (05:46), 2025
3/5 Still, Shuffle, squeak, ssh!, shutter, click!, video (05:46), 2025
4/5 Still, Shuffle, squeak, ssh!, shutter, click!, video (05:46), 2025
5/5 Still, Shuffle, squeak, ssh!, shutter, click!, video (05:46), 2025
07    Destruction shall be our inventory

University of Bristol
Paul Mellon Centre
11 July 2025
Lecture Performance

Early Career Research Network Summer Symposium: British Art and Architecture in the Digital Age

The lecture performance interrogates the possibilities of “radical un-conservation”—a concept proposed by the artist Dan Guthrie to describe the process of acquiring an object with the intention of destroying it. The destructive potential of radical un-conservation is here applied to the museum’s growing utilization of 3D technologies, which are understood as the latest milestone in the museum’s regime of incessant progress and kleptomania.

The performance explores the possibilities for resistance against the museum’s hoarding and preservation practices, using the OBJ file structure (the file type used to store the spatial data of 3D models produced via photogrammetry) as its key site of intervention. By undertaking its own radical un-conservation work, the artist grapples with the central question: what to do with a history that should not exist?
1/4 Lecture performance, Destruction shall be our inventory, 2025
2/4 Lecture performance, Destruction shall be our inventory, 2025
3/4 Lecture performance, Destruction shall be our inventory, 2025
4/4 Lecture performance, Destruction shall be our inventory, 2025
08    #europe is not my centre

2025
Video


2 minutes, 33 seconds
#europe is not my centre examines the possibilities of resistance against the museum’s digital hoarding practices that are accelerating with the widespread adoption of photogrammetric technologies. The video interrogates the OBJ (the file used to store the spatial data of 3D models generated through photogrammetry) as the museum’s latest spatial arena for staging mass spectacle of its object collections. The OBJ inherits the vitrine’s temporal and spatial demands of containment, imposing a condition of hyper-visibility, abstraction, and inertia on museum objects.

Removing the first line of vertex data from the OBJ file produces a disfiguring effect: the 3D mesh fractures as polygon faces are tessellated using the wrong geometric coordinates in the file’s code. This practice of digital defacement is applied to A’a—a statue produced on Rurutu (circa 1591–1647) and now hoarded in the British Museum’s Oceanic Collection as Oc,LMS.19. By exploiting the structural fragility of the OBJ file, digital defacement reconfigures photogrammetry as not a tool for visual optimization, but a tool for visual degradation. The video’s narrative unfolds through a cut-up method, splicing the author’s words with fragments of the OBJ’s coded language and a refrain of anti-colonial resistance drawn from the words of filmmaker Alpha Oumar Konaré and the poetry of M. NourbeSe Philip.
1/4 Still, #europe is not my centre,  video (02:33), 2025
2/4 Still, #europe is not my centre,  video (02:33), 2025
3/4 Still, #europe is not my centre,  video (02:33), 2025
4/4 Still, #europe is not my centre,  video (02:33), 2025